Red Bull consumers can claim $10 after false advertising lawsuit

Benjamin Careathers, a regular consumer of Red Bull, sued the drinks giant for false advertising.

The American argued that after 10 years drinking the caffeinated soft drink he neither had wings nor any enhanced athletic or intellectual performance.

Red Bull slogan claims the fizzy drink “gives you wings”.

According to the complainant, the Austria-based firm deliberately misled unsuspecting customers to spend millions of dollars on the premium drink in the hope of gaining an edge on their competitors.

And fearful of a costly and time-consuming trial, Red Bull was forced to settle the case out of court, pledging to refund $10 to any US customer who bought the drink since 2002 and agreeing to amend future advertising.

Red Bull GmbH must pay $13 million to settle the suit, $6.5 million of which will go into a fund that will be paid out to an estimated 1.4 million consumers, who can apply for the refund through a specially created website.

“Red Bull settled the lawsuit to avoid the cost and distraction of litigation,” a spokesman said.

“However, Red Bull maintains its marketing and labelling have always been truthful and accurate, and denies any and all wrongdoing or liability.”

However, the class-action lawsuit, which began in January 2013, cited evidence in The New York Times, Nutrition Reviews and the European Food Safety Authority Journal that indicated energy drinks provide their boost through caffeine alone, not guarana or any other ingredient.

As a result, Benjamin Careathers argued, Red Bull’s performance-enhancing properties could only be tested by the quantity of caffeine in each can, which worked out more expensive that a cup of coffee from Starbucks.

“Such deceptive conduct and practices mean that [Red Bull’s] advertising and marketing is not just <<puffery>>, but is instead deceptive and fraudulent and is therefore actionable,” the suit said.

“Even though there is a lack of genuine scientific support for a claim that Red Bull branded energy drinks provide any more benefit to a consumer than a cup of coffee, the Red Bull defendants persistently and pervasively market their product as a superior source of <<energy>> worthy of a premium price over a cup of coffee or other sources of caffeine.”

The company’ pledge to refund $10 – or $15 worth of Red Bull products – to each drinker since 2002 has sparked an overwhelming reaction around the world, temporarily crashing the energydrinksettlement.com website.

It has since been confirmed that the amount refunded to individuals could be much lower than originally estimated, as more and more consumers apply for compensation from a finite pool of settlement money.