Saturday, December 6, 2025
Newsletter
Home Blog Page 11

Houthi Drone from Yemen Strikes Israel’s Eilat, Injuring Twenty

Roy Siemens
-
0
Houthi Drone from Yemen Strikes Israel’s Eilat, Injuring Twenty

EILAT, ISRAEL — A drone launched from Yemen has struck the southern Israeli city of Eilat, injuring at least 20 people and opening a dangerous new front in the already volatile Middle East. The strike, claimed by the Iranian-backed Houthi rebels, signals a significant escalation of regional tensions and a direct challenge to Israel’s military dominance, demonstrating a new vulnerability in its advanced air defense systems.

The attack occurred on Wednesday afternoon when the drone, flying a flight path designed to evade radar, successfully penetrated Israel’s multi-layered air defenses. It slammed into the ground near a bustling hotel and shopping district in Eilat, a popular resort city on the Red Sea. Medics from the Magen David Adom rescue service confirmed that at least 20 people were injured by shrapnel, with two in serious condition and others suffering moderate to light wounds.

The Iran-backed Houthi rebels, who control large parts of Yemen, were quick to claim responsibility for the attack, stating it was carried out in solidarity with Palestinians in Gaza. The group has been launching drones and missiles at Israel since the beginning of the war, but the vast majority have either been intercepted by Israeli defenses or landed in open areas. This latest strike, with its high casualty count, marks a significant and worrying development.

Adding to the gravity of the incident, the Israeli military confirmed that a drone launched from Yemen was responsible and that “interception attempts were made.” Local reports, however, were more specific, citing initial investigations that confirmed the Iron Dome air defense system had failed to stop the drone. The failure of the advanced defense system to neutralize the threat has prompted a formal investigation and raised questions about the system’s effectiveness against the low-altitude, long-range drones now being deployed by the Houthis.

The attack drew a swift and angry response from Israeli officials. Defense Minister Israel Katz vowed a response on social media, warning that “anyone who harms Israel will be harmed sevenfold.” The mayor of Eilat, Eli Lankri, called on the government to “strike the Houthis hard” in retaliation. For years, Israel has retaliated for Houthi aggression with targeted airstrikes on military infrastructure in Yemen. But this latest, more damaging strike, suggests a new and more dangerous phase of the conflict has begun, one that underscores the regional nature of the war and the constant threat of a wider confrontation.

Artemis II Mission: Meet the Crew Returning to the Moon

James J. Williams
-
0
Artemis II Mission: Meet the Crew Returning to the Moon

HOUSTON — They are a crew of four trailblazers, a diverse group of astronauts chosen to lead humanity’s long-awaited return to the Moon. On Sunday, NASA officially announced the crew for the Artemis II mission, a historic journey that will mark the first time a crewed vessel has ventured to the Moon in over half a century. But this is not just a return to the past; it is a giant leap into the future, led by a crew that redefines what it means to be a space explorer.

The crew is a group of seasoned veterans and international partners, each bringing a unique set of skills and a history-making distinction to the mission:

  • Reid Wiseman, Commander: A decorated U.S. Navy aviator, Commander Wiseman will lead the mission. A veteran of a 165-day mission on the International Space Station, he has served as the Chief of the Astronaut Office, overseeing all flight operations and training. His steady leadership and deep experience in deep space are crucial for the high-stakes journey ahead.
  • Victor Glover, Pilot: A U.S. Navy captain and veteran of a 168-day mission on the International Space Station, Glover will pilot the Orion spacecraft. His role is particularly historic: he will become the first person of color to fly on a lunar mission. His extensive background as a test pilot, with over 40 aircraft under his belt, makes him uniquely qualified for the challenges of this inaugural flight.
  • Christina Koch, Mission Specialist: An electrical engineer and veteran of a record-setting 328-day mission on the International Space Station, the longest single spaceflight by a woman. Koch will become the first woman to fly on a lunar mission, a monumental step forward for gender equality in space. Her scientific expertise and extensive experience in the harsh environment of orbit make her an invaluable member of the crew.
  • Jeremy Hansen, Mission Specialist: A colonel in the Royal Canadian Air Force, Hansen is a fighter pilot and the first Canadian to venture to the Moon. His inclusion in the crew is a testament to the international collaboration that underpins the Artemis program. His deep experience in astronaut training and mission planning will be critical in ensuring a successful flight.

The Artemis II mission, currently scheduled for a February 2026 launch, will not land on the lunar surface. Instead, the crew will fly a 10-day test mission around the Moon, journeying farther than any human has before. The purpose is to test the Orion spacecraft’s life support systems and to confirm that the vehicle can safely carry a crew in deep space before a future landing mission.

This diverse crew is a clear statement that the future of space exploration will not be the exclusive domain of any single nation or demographic. They are not only a symbol of humanity’s enduring quest to explore, but also a beacon of hope for a future where the boundless expanse of space is open to all who dare to dream.

Jimmy Kimmel Sends a Defiant Message to Trump in Fiery Return

Lisa.Felice
-
0
Jimmy Kimmel Sends a Defiant Message to Trump in Fiery Return

In a highly anticipated and emotional return to his show, Jimmy Kimmel pulled no punches in sending a clear and defiant message to President Donald Trump, directly addressing the political firestorm that led to his controversial suspension. Back on the air after a six-day hiatus, Kimmel used his opening monologue not only to offer a heartfelt apology but also to lay down a marker for the future of late-night comedy in a polarized America.

“I’m happy to be here tonight,” a visibly emotional Kimmel told his audience, opening with a raw and personal reflection on the events that led to his temporary removal. He clarified that it was “never my intention to make light of the murder of a young man” and said he understood how his initial comments about the killing of Charlie Kirk might have been perceived as “ill-timed or unclear.”

But what followed was a direct and unsparing message to the President. Kimmel took aim at Trump’s social media posts celebrating his suspension and ridiculing his ratings. “You almost have to feel sorry for him,” Kimmel said. “He tried his best to cancel me. Instead, he forced millions of people to watch the show. That backfired bigly.”

Jimmy Kimmel returns

Kimmel did not stop there. He criticized the President for “celebrating Americans losing their livelihoods because he can’t take a joke,” a clear reference to Trump’s continued pressure on other networks to fire late-night hosts. The monologue was a powerful defense of the First Amendment, with Kimmel showing a social media post from FCC Chairman Brendan Carr—a key figure in the pressure campaign—that ironically celebrated free speech and political satire.

While Kimmel’s return was a victory, it was not a clean one. He noted that some local ABC affiliates, particularly those owned by Sinclair and Nexstar, were still refusing to air his show. This continued boycott underscores the high-stakes battle between national networks and politically-motivated affiliate groups, a new front in the culture war that threatens to fragment the media landscape.

The emotional and defiant monologue served as a powerful statement that Kimmel and his fellow hosts will not be silenced. In a week that saw a President take on a comedian, it was clear by the end of the broadcast that the comedian was not only unbowed, but also ready for the next round.

Doctors Push Back on White House Claim Linking Tylenol and Autism

Kathryn R. Bown
-
0
Doctors Push Back on White House Claim Linking Tylenol and Autism

In a rare and unified response, major medical organizations are forcefully pushing back against President Trump’s assertion that a common pain reliever is linked to autism, with many accusing the administration of promoting dangerous misinformation and risking a public health crisis. The rebuke from the medical community is not just a scientific correction, but a desperate effort to prevent a wave of misinformation from causing real harm.

On Monday, President Trump, speaking at a White House press conference, urged pregnant women to avoid taking acetaminophen, the active ingredient in Tylenol. He also discouraged giving the medication to young children, suggesting a connection between the drug and rising autism rates. The announcement was met with immediate alarm from doctors and scientists around the world.

The Scientific Consensus

Leading organizations, including the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), immediately released statements condemning the claims. The ACOG, which represents over 60,000 physicians, called the suggestions “irresponsible” and stated they send a “harmful and confusing message to pregnant patients.” The AAP was just as direct, stating that “studies do not point to a causal link between the use of acetaminophen and autism.”

This pushback is rooted in decades of research. While some small, observational studies have shown a weak association between acetaminophen use and autism, the overwhelming scientific consensus, supported by larger and more robust studies, has found no such link. For example, a major 2024 analysis of 2.4 million children in Sweden found no connection when researchers controlled for familial and genetic factors, which are known to play a large role in autism. Many scientists say that the “association” seen in some studies is likely due to familial confounding, where the same genetic tendencies that increase a person’s risk for autism also increase their likelihood of experiencing conditions that require pain medication.

Trump Tylenol autism

The Public Health Warning

The medical community’s primary fear is not just the spread of bad science, but the real-world consequences of it. Doctors are concerned that pregnant women, terrified by the warning, will stop taking a medication that is considered one of the safest for treating fever and pain. Untreated high fevers during pregnancy can be dangerous, leading to risks of birth defects, premature birth, and even miscarriage.

“Not treating the fever probably has more adverse effects that you need to worry about than taking the medication,” said Steven J. Fleischman, president of ACOG. . His words, echoed by countless other doctors, highlight the very real dangers that the President’s statements could create.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and other global health bodies, including the World Health Organization (WHO) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA), have also affirmed that the evidence for a causal link is inconsistent and that the drug remains safe for use as directed. For now, the medical community’s response is a unified front against a claim it views as not only baseless but actively harmful to public health.

Dua Lipa Denies Firing Agent in Palestine-Israel Row

Lisa.Felice
-
0
Dua Lipa Denies Firing Agent in Palestine-Israel Row

In a furious pushback against what she called a “malicious and false narrative,” pop superstar Dua Lipa has vehemently denied a report that she fired her longtime agent over his pro-Israel views, accusing her critics of exploiting a global tragedy for clickbait. The incident, born of a tabloid rumor, has exposed the raw, polarizing tensions of the Israel-Palestine conflict within the entertainment industry.

The controversy erupted earlier this week when a report from the Daily Mail claimed that Lipa had dismissed her agent, David Levy, after learning he had allegedly signed a private letter urging organizers of the Glastonbury music festival to drop the Irish rap trio Kneecap from its lineup. The reason for the purported letter was Kneecap’s vocal and defiant pro-Palestinian stance. The story quickly went viral, amplified by social media and other outlets, painting a picture of an artist taking a drastic professional step over a political disagreement.

Dua Lipa Kosovo citizenship

But on Tuesday, Lipa set the record straight on her Instagram story, dismantling the rumor piece by piece. She confirmed that while she “does not condone the actions of David Levy or other music executives toward an artist speaking their truth,” the firing story was “completely false.” The singer clarified that her professional relationship with Levy had been in flux for years and that he had not been involved in her day-to-day business since 2019.

Her talent agency, William Morris Endeavour (WME), corroborated her statement, calling the tabloid narrative “categorically false.” A WME spokesperson clarified that Levy had officially “removed himself from the project among others earlier this year,” a long-planned professional move unrelated to the Kneecap controversy or the current geopolitical climate.

Dua Lipa, who is of Albanian descent, has been one of the few global pop stars of her stature to speak openly and consistently about the conflict. She has repeatedly called for a ceasefire in Gaza, signed open letters demanding an end to UK arms sales to Israel, and posted to her millions of followers, “Burning children alive can never be justified.” The incident highlights how the Israel-Palestine conflict has become a political minefield for public figures, where even routine business decisions can be twisted into a charged political statement, forcing celebrities to not only pick a side but also to defend themselves from fabricated narratives.

The Last Italian Diva: Claudia Cardinale, Luminous Star of ‘The Leopard,’ Dies at 87

Sonia Pantiss
-
0
The Last Italian Diva: Claudia Cardinale, Luminous Star of ‘The Leopard,’ Dies at 87

PARIS — Claudia Cardinale, the iconic Italian actress and the luminous star of cinematic masterpieces that defined the golden age of European cinema, has died. She was 87. The news, confirmed by her family, marks the passing of a legend whose career spanned over 100 films and a life that was as complex and compelling as the characters she portrayed.

Cardinale died on Tuesday in her home in Nemours, France, a quiet end to a career that was anything but. Born to Sicilian parents in Tunisia, her rise to stardom began almost by accident when she won a beauty contest, which earned her a trip to the Venice Film Festival. There, her striking beauty and independent spirit captivated legendary directors who would make her an international star.

She was most famous for her collaborations with two giants of Italian cinema. In Federico Fellini’s surrealist masterpiece 8½, she was the ethereal, dreamlike muse, the unattainable ideal of womanhood. In the very same year, she gave an entirely different, but equally powerful, performance in Luchino Visconti’s lavish period epic The Leopard, in which she played the fiery and rebellious Angelica, the peasant girl whose beauty upends the old aristocratic order. Her effortless ability to be both an object of desire and a woman of substance set her apart from her contemporaries.

Her allure was not confined to Italy. In Hollywood, she starred in the original The Pink Panther and the classic western Once Upon a Time in the West, where she played a world-weary and tough-as-nails prostitute, a role that was a testament to her versatility. She worked alongside cinematic titans, from Marcello Mastroianni to Burt Lancaster to Charles Bronson, but she was never simply a leading lady; she was a force in her own right, famously returning to European cinema to pursue more complex roles and artistic freedom.

Tributes have poured in from around the world. French President Emmanuel Macron said, “We French will always carry this Italian and global star in our hearts, in the eternity of cinema.” The mayor of Cannes, David Lisnard, called her a “masterpiece in herself.” Beyond her iconic on-screen presence, she was a lifelong advocate for women’s rights and a UNESCO Goodwill Ambassador, a legacy of activism she pursued with the same passion she brought to the silver screen.

With the passing of Claudia Cardinale, a luminous chapter in the history of cinema has come to a close. She was more than a star; she was the embodiment of a defiant and beautiful femininity that left an indelible mark on cinema, and she will be remembered as a true icon of a golden age.

Trump Declares Kyiv Can Win Back ‘All of Ukraine’ After Talks with Zelensky

Roy Siemens
-
0
Trump Declares Kyiv Can Win Back ‘All of Ukraine’ After Talks with Zelensky

In a stunning and dramatic reversal of his long-held skepticism, President Donald Trump has declared that Ukraine can “absolutely” win back all of its territory from Russia, a powerful new message delivered after his first face-to-face meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly.

The declaration marks a significant pivot from Trump’s past policy of a negotiated settlement, which often suggested Ukraine might have to cede territory to end the war. In a statement on his social media platform following the meeting, Trump wrote: “I think Ukraine, with the support of the European Union, is in a position to fight and WIN all of Ukraine back in its original form.” He dismissed Russia’s military as a “paper tiger” and said the Russian economy was in “BIG Economic trouble,” concluding that “this is the time for Ukraine to act.”

For Ukrainian President Zelenskyy, the shift was a major diplomatic victory. Their past encounters, including a highly contentious meeting in the Oval Office earlier this year, have been marked by tension. But on Tuesday, the two leaders exchanged warm greetings, and Zelenskyy later told reporters that Trump’s new stance could be a “game-changer” for Ukraine. He thanked the U.S. President for his “personal efforts to stop this war,” and echoed Trump’s call for European nations to stop buying Russian oil.

While the new rhetoric offers a glimmer of hope for Kyiv, it remains to be seen if it will be followed by a concrete and sustained change in policy. Trump’s statement did not include a commitment to new U.S. direct financial or military aid, instead suggesting that future weapons supplies would be provided to NATO, who would then be responsible for getting them to Ukraine.

The declaration also comes amid a complex and evolving political landscape. Trump, who has frequently boasted of his ability to negotiate an end to the conflict, has seen his peace efforts stall in recent months. Russian President Vladimir Putin has refused to meet with Zelenskyy, and the war has only intensified. The President’s new message puts the ball squarely in Europe’s court and signals that he believes the time for negotiations has passed, and the time for action has arrived.

Trump UN Remarks: From Laughter to Sobering Attention, the World Re-learns a President

Diane A. Wade
-
0
Trump UN Remarks: From Laughter to Sobering Attention, the World Re-learns a President

UNITED NATIONS — Six years ago, President Donald Trump stood before the United Nations General Assembly and was met with a ripple of mocking laughter after declaring his administration had “accomplished more than almost any administration in the history of our country.” This year, as he delivered a fiery, hour-long assault on global institutions, the silence was deafening. It was a powerful and somber testament to a world that has grown from amusement to an uncomfortable, sobered acceptance of his rhetoric.

The scene in 2018 was one of disbelief. Delegates and world leaders, many of whom saw his election as a passing aberration, tittered openly at the American President’s boast. Trump, seemingly taken aback, remarked, “I didn’t expect that reaction, but that’s okay,” a moment that was replayed endlessly as a symbol of his unconventional approach to diplomacy. He was the outsider, the showman, a curiosity on the global stage.

But on Tuesday, as he returned to the world’s most prominent diplomatic forum, the theatricality was gone, replaced by a grim resolve. His speech was a blistering repudiation of multilateralism and global cooperation. He called on nations to close their borders, warning that their countries were “going to hell” due to immigration and “green energy” policies. He dismissed the United Nations as a feckless institution that only offers “empty words” and “strongly worded letters” that “don’t solve war.”

The delegates listened, pens poised, faces largely expressionless. There was no mirth, no nervous chuckles. The laughter of 2018 was a luxury born of a belief that his presidency was an anomaly, a passing storm. The silence of 2025 is the sound of a world that knows better. They are no longer a disbelieving audience; they are an audience that has come to terms with an enduring reality.

The shift in reception reflects a deeper transformation in the international system. In his first term, world leaders held out hope that the United States would soon return to its more familiar internationalist role. Now, as Trump embarks on his second term, they recognize that his “America First” agenda is a foundational principle of his administration, and they must now engage with it as such. The laughter of 2018 was the sound of a world that didn’t know what to make of Trump. The silence of today is the sound of a world that has come to terms with it, for better or worse.

Jimmy Kimmel’s Return Hits a Roadblock as TV Stations Refuse to Air His Show

Lisa.Felice
-
0
Jimmy Kimmel’s Return Hits a Roadblock as TV Stations Refuse to Air His Show

ust as Jimmy Kimmel’s show was set to return to the air following a brief but controversial suspension, major TV station groups across the country have refused to carry the broadcast, a stunning act of defiance that has plunged ABC into a new and complex power struggle. The decision by two of the nation’s largest affiliate owners to preempt the program has effectively put the late-night host back in a state of indefinite limbo for a quarter of his potential audience.

Sinclair Broadcast Group and Nexstar Media Group, which collectively operate over 70 ABC affiliates in major markets like Washington, D.C., Seattle, and Nashville, announced they would not air the show despite Disney’s decision to reinstate it. Both companies had initially pulled the show last week after Kimmel’s monologue about the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk was deemed “ill-timed and insensitive.”

In a statement, Nexstar said it stands by its decision to preempt the show, “pending assurance that all parties are committed to fostering an environment of respectful, constructive dialogue.” Sinclair, for its part, has been even more explicit in its demands, calling for Kimmel to issue a public apology to the Kirk family and make a “meaningful personal donation” to their organization. Sinclair is replacing the show with local news and other programming.

The affiliate rebellion presents a new and significant challenge for ABC and its parent company, Disney. While ABC can distribute the show through its own streaming platforms, the refusal by these station groups means the show will lose millions of viewers in key markets, a blow to its ratings and ad revenue. The move also serves as a powerful reminder of the ongoing power struggle between national networks and their local partners. For years, the networks have held most of the leverage, but with the rise of media consolidation, these large affiliate groups have found new power to push back on programming they deem controversial or not in line with their local values.

The conflict has also become a political flashpoint. FCC Chairman Brendan Carr, who had previously warned of regulatory action against ABC, praised the affiliates’ decision to push back on what they saw as inappropriate content. The clash over Kimmel’s future is no longer just about a television show; it has become a central battle in a broader war over free speech, political pressure, and the very future of the American media landscape.

The Man Who Tried to Kill the President: Jury Convicts Ryan Routh of Trump Assassination Attempt

Clyde K. Valle
-
0
The Man Who Tried to Kill the President: Jury Convicts Ryan Routh of Trump Assassination Attempt

FORT PIERCE, FL — In a landmark verdict that concludes a highly publicized trial, a federal jury in Florida has found Ryan Routh guilty of attempting to assassinate President Donald Trump, a crime that sent shockwaves through the nation during the 2024 presidential election campaign. The conviction, delivered after less than three hours of deliberation, closes the legal chapter on an attack that could have altered the course of American history.

Routh, 59, who represented himself in the two-week trial, was convicted on all five charges, including attempted assassination of a major presidential candidate, possessing a firearm in furtherance of a crime of violence, and assaulting a Secret Service agent. Prosecutors successfully argued that Routh had spent weeks meticulously plotting to kill Trump, using burner phones and making 17 reconnaissance trips to Trump’s West Palm Beach golf course.

The failed assassination attempt took place on September 15, 2024, as Trump was playing golf. Routh, a self-styled mercenary leader with a history of erratic behavior, was discovered hiding in shrubbery with a high-powered SKS rifle. According to testimony from a Secret Service agent, Routh aimed his rifle at the agent, who then fired on Routh, causing him to drop his weapon and flee without firing a shot. Routh was arrested shortly after after a witness who saw him flee provided law enforcement with a description of his vehicle. A 12-page letter found at his residence, in which he wrote, “This was an assassination attempt on Donald Trump, but I failed you,” sealed the prosecution’s case.

The verdict was met with a dramatic scene in the courtroom as Routh, after being found guilty, attempted to stab himself in the neck with a pen. He was quickly subdued by U.S. Marshals and removed from the courtroom. The incident, which left him unharmed, served as a harrowing end to a trial marked by his rambling and at times bizarre statements.

The verdict was celebrated by the Department of Justice, with Attorney General Pam Bondi stating on social media that it “illustrates the Department of Justice’s commitment to punishing those who engage in political violence.” For the Secret Service, who also thwarted a separate assassination attempt on Trump in Pennsylvania just two months prior, the verdict is a powerful affirmation of their work.

Routh faces a possible sentence of life in prison when he is sentenced on December 18. The jury’s swift decision serves as a powerful reminder of the deep divisions in the country and the constant threats to high-profile political figures, reinforcing the notion that in the current political climate, every day brings a new and unpredictable challenge to national security.

Super Typhoon Ragasa’s Fury Bursts Taiwan Lake as China Braces for Impact

Nancy Clayson
-
0
Super Typhoon Ragasa’s Fury Bursts Taiwan Lake as China Braces for Impact

TAIPEI — In a tragic display of a super typhoon’s destructive power, a decades-old barrier lake in eastern Taiwan has burst its banks, unleashing a torrent of floodwaters that left at least two people dead and dozens missing. The powerful storm, named Ragasa, is now barreling towards China, where authorities are bracing for what is being called the strongest storm to hit the mainland in a decade.

The catastrophe unfolded in Taiwan’s Hualien County, where torrential rains from the outer bands of Super Typhoon Ragasa caused the Mataian Creek barrier lake to overflow. The surge of water was so powerful it washed away a bridge and submerged the nearby town of Guangfu, with water levels reaching the second floor of some homes. Rescuers are now in a frantic search for the missing, and over 260 people were trapped on higher ground.

Typhoon Ragasa, which has been described as the most powerful storm of the year, has already left a trail of destruction across the Philippines, where it has killed at least three people. Now, with sustained winds of 220 kilometers per hour (137 mph), it is on a direct path towards southern China’s densely populated Guangdong province. Authorities in Hong Kong, a global financial hub in the storm’s path, have issued their highest storm warning, comparing the approaching threat to some of the most destructive storms in the city’s recent history.

In response, China has launched a massive, coordinated effort to prepare for the storm’s arrival. Over 400,000 residents in Guangdong province, particularly those in low-lying and flood-prone areas, are being relocated to safety. Schools and businesses have been shuttered, and flights and train services have been canceled. The measures underscore the immense scale of the threat and the government’s resolve to minimize casualties.

The storm’s fury in Taiwan and its looming presence in China serve as a grim reminder of the increasing intensity of extreme weather events. While the people of Taiwan begin the long process of recovery, China is facing a monumental challenge that will test its infrastructure and emergency response capabilities in a way not seen in years.

NASA Sets Date for First Crewed Lunar Mission in 50 Years

James J. Williams
-
0
NASA Sets Date for First Crewed Lunar Mission in 50 Years

In a historic announcement that signals the dawn of a new era of space exploration, NASA has set a firm date for its return to the Moon, targeting a February 2026 launch for its first crewed mission in over half a century. The flight, known as Artemis II, will not land astronauts on the lunar surface, but it represents a crucial and long-awaited step in a global race back to our celestial neighbor.

The mission will send four astronauts aboard the Orion spacecraft on a 10-day journey around the Moon, flying farther from Earth than any human has been since the Apollo program ended in 1972. The crew—Commander Reid Wiseman, Pilot Victor Glover, and Mission Specialist Christina Koch from NASA, along with Canadian Space Agency astronaut Jeremy Hansen—will serve as test subjects for the new era of deep space travel, confirming that the spacecraft’s systems can support human life in the unforgiving environment of deep space.

NASA Moon
Image source: picryl.com

The Artemis II flight will be a test of the most powerful rocket in the world, the Space Launch System (SLS). Standing taller than the Statue of Liberty, the mega-rocket will propel the Orion capsule out of Earth’s orbit and onto a “free-return trajectory” around the Moon, a path that will slingshot it back to Earth using the Moon’s gravity. It is the first major step since the uncrewed Artemis I mission in 2022, and its success is a non-negotiable prerequisite for future lunar landings.

While the mission is a testament to scientific ingenuity, it also carries profound geopolitical significance. It places the United States in direct competition with a resurgent Chinese space program, which has a stated goal of landing its own astronauts on the Moon by 2030. NASA officials have stressed that safety is their top priority, even as they face pressure to move quickly to regain a leadership position in space exploration.

The ultimate goal of the Artemis program, beyond this initial flyby, is to establish a sustainable human presence on the Moon and use it as a proving ground for the next great journey: a crewed mission to Mars. But for now, the focus is on a single, historic moment. Over 50 years after humanity last left Earth’s orbit, the world will once again watch as astronauts venture into the deep abyss, on a path that is both a tribute to the past and a bold promise for the future.

Disney Reverses Course, Kimmel’s Show to Return After Uproar

Lisa.Felice
-
0
Disney Reverses Course, Kimmel’s Show to Return After Uproar

Just days after its sudden and controversial suspension, Jimmy Kimmel Live! is set to return to the air, Disney announced on Monday, a dramatic reversal that follows a storm of public outrage, a unified show of support from his fellow hosts, and immense pressure on the network from across the industry. The decision marks a victory for free expression advocates and ends a six-day hiatus that sparked a national debate over corporate capitulation and government censorship.

In a statement, the Walt Disney Company confirmed the show would resume production on Tuesday, a week after it was “pre-empted indefinitely” following comments Kimmel made about the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk. The company’s statement said the temporary pause was “to avoid further inflaming a tense situation” but that “thoughtful conversations” with Kimmel had led to the decision to bring him back.

Jimmy Kimmel Live suspended

The abrupt return is a clear sign that the network caved to pressure—but not from the government. The suspension itself, which followed threats from FCC Chairman Brendan Carr and a public cheer from President Trump, triggered a furious backlash from Hollywood. Over 400 celebrities, including Meryl Streep, Ben Affleck, and Tom Hanks, signed an open letter condemning the move as a “dark moment for freedom of speech.” Fellow late-night hosts like Stephen Colbert, Jon Stewart, and Jimmy Fallon publicly rallied to Kimmel’s defense, and the Writers Guild of America (WGA) called the suspension an act of “corporate cowardice.”

While the return is a clear victory, the fight is not over. The suspension was initially triggered when Nexstar and Sinclair, two of the largest owners of ABC affiliate stations, preempted the show. On Monday, a Sinclair representative stated that the network would not air Kimmel’s show on its local stations, including in the key Washington, D.C. market, until the host apologizes to the Kirk family and makes a “meaningful personal donation” to them.

The ongoing battle between national broadcasters and local affiliates, amplified by political pressure, underscores the precarious state of late-night television. For now, a voice that was silenced has returned to the air. But the conditions of that return—and the power struggle it lays bare—ensure that the future of late-night comedy will remain a subject of both laughter and fear.

France Joins Historic Wave of Nations Recognizing Palestinian State

Roy Siemens
-
0
France Joins Historic Wave of Nations Recognizing Palestinian State

UNITED NATIONS — In a major and symbolic diplomatic break from its traditional policy, France has officially recognized a Palestinian state, joining a growing wave of European and Western nations that are shifting their position in a move that has outraged Israel and energized the Palestinian cause. The historic announcement, made by French President Emmanuel Macron at a high-level United Nations meeting, cements a new and increasingly united front against Israel’s ongoing offensive in Gaza and its rejection of a two-state solution.

The decision by France, a permanent member of the UN Security Council, follows the formal recognition of Palestinian statehood by the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and Portugal just a day earlier. In his address at the UN General Assembly, Macron declared, “True to the historic commitment of my country to the Middle East, to peace between the Israelis and the Palestinians, this is why I declare that today, France recognizes the state of Palestine.” The announcement was met with a standing ovation from a majority of the 140-plus delegations in attendance.

The coordinated move is a direct response to a two-fold reality on the ground: the intensifying humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza and Israel’s accelerated expansion of settlements in the West Bank. European leaders, including Macron and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, argue that their recognitions are not a reward for Hamas but a necessary step to keep the peace process from collapsing entirely. The hope is that by empowering the Palestinian Authority and offering a political horizon, it will strengthen moderate voices and provide a viable path to a peaceful resolution.

The diplomatic unity, however, was met with a fierce and predictable backlash. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu condemned the recognitions as “appeasement towards jihadist terrorists” and vowed retaliation, a sentiment echoed by his government. An Israeli official confirmed that annexing parts of the West Bank is a retaliatory option being considered, a move that would further deepen Israel’s isolation. For its part, the Trump administration made it clear it opposes the recognitions, with U.S. and Israeli delegations pointedly absent from the UN summit where Macron made his announcement.

For the Palestinian people, the recognition is a major diplomatic victory. The Palestinian Authority’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs welcomed the move as a “historic and courageous decision” that aligns with international law. While largely symbolic, the declarations by these major world powers serve to delegitimize the Israeli occupation and put pressure on the United States, which has consistently used its veto power to block full UN membership for a Palestinian state.

The wave of recognitions, led by France, signals a tectonic shift in global diplomacy. It marks a clear break from decades of a U.S.-led policy and ushers in a new and uncertain chapter in the Middle East. With key allies like the UK and France now charting their own course, the U.S. is finding itself increasingly alone in its approach to one of the world’s most intractable conflicts.

Trump Links Tylenol to Autism, Drawing Fire from Medical Experts

Kathryn R. Bown
-
0
Trump Links Tylenol to Autism, Drawing Fire from Medical Experts

In a highly controversial claim that has sent shockwaves through the medical community, President Trump and his administration have officially linked the use of the common pain reliever Tylenol to an increased risk of autism. The announcement, made at a White House press conference, was met with immediate and widespread skepticism from scientists and public health officials who warn that the unproven assertion could cause a public health crisis and erode trust in established medicine.

The policy, which was spearheaded by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., was introduced with a statement that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) would begin notifying doctors that the active ingredient in Tylenol, acetaminophen, “can be associated with a very increased risk of autism.” President Trump declared from the White House, “Taking Tylenol is not good,” and said the administration was strongly recommending women limit its use during pregnancy unless medically necessary. The announcement followed a weekend where the President had teased a major revelation, telling a crowd that he believed he had “found an answer to autism.”

But the administration’s claim stands in stark opposition to the consensus of the medical community. Leading organizations like the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) have long held that Tylenol is a safe and appropriate option for pregnant women seeking to manage pain and fever. Experts have repeatedly cautioned that a small number of studies that have found a weak correlation do not prove causation. They point to a major 2024 Swedish study involving millions of births that found no link between acetaminophen and autism.

Medical professionals and patient advocacy groups are expressing grave concern that the announcement will unleash a wave of fear and misinformation. Dr. David Mandell of the University of Pennsylvania, an autism expert, has warned that a claim of a causal link between Tylenol and autism “is unproven” and that the real danger lies in women avoiding a medication needed to treat fevers that can, if left untreated, cause harm to the fetus.

For some families with autistic children, the announcement feels like a painful blame game. “It makes me feel like they’re trying to say it’s my fault,” one parent told a reporter, “and that’s just so wrong.” The move is seen as the culmination of an effort by Kennedy, who has for years championed debunked theories about environmental factors and autism.

The President’s claim is a significant test of the public’s trust in both political leaders and the medical establishment. It puts the government in a direct and unprecedented conflict with mainstream science, forcing the public to choose between the advice of their doctors and the word of their President.

How the Kirk Memorial Forged a New MAGA Vision

James J. Williams
-
0
How the Kirk Memorial Forged a New MAGA Vision

The memorial service for conservative activist Charlie Kirk was more than just a tribute to a fallen figure; it was a powerful and revealing fusion of religious fervor and political zeal that offered a glimpse into the future of the MAGA movement, a future where faith is not just an undercurrent but a central, defining force. The solemn tribute quickly morphed into a spiritual revival and a political rally, with speakers on the stage and thousands in the audience weaving a narrative where politics and a perceived “spiritual war” are one and the same.

The event at State Farm Stadium, which began with Christian worship music, was a masterclass in this blending of sacred and profane. As attendees waved “Never Surrender” signs alongside Bibles, a rotating cast of speakers framed Kirk’s life not in political terms alone, but in a divine context. Kirk was repeatedly called a “martyr,” a “prophet,” and a “warrior for Christ.” Rob McCoy, Kirk’s pastor, declared that Kirk “looked at politics as an on-ramp to Jesus,” a powerful articulation of a new political-religious fusion.

The ideological poles of the movement were on full display in the speeches of its two most prominent voices. Charlie Kirk’s widow, Erika Kirk, who was named the new CEO of Turning Point USA, delivered the emotional core of the service. She tearfully announced she had forgiven her husband’s killer, a message she said was inspired by Christ and her late husband. She vowed to continue his work through the newly created “Turning Point USA Faith,” which will aim to recruit thousands of new pastors and congregations.

Immediately following her plea for forgiveness, President Donald Trump took the stage. His address was a powerful and stark contrast to hers, as he praised Kirk as “a martyr for American freedom” and “our greatest evangelist.” But in a viral, unscripted moment, he veered from his prepared remarks to declare, “He did not hate his opponents. He wanted the best for them. That’s where I disagreed with Charlie. I hate my opponent, and I don’t want the best for them.” The moment, which drew both laughter and applause, crystallized a central conflict within the new movement’s soul.

Other speakers, including Vice President J.D. Vance and White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, took a more belligerent tone. Miller delivered a fiery, apocalyptic speech, telling an undefined “you” that “You are nothing. You are wickedness. You are jealousy, you are envy, you are hatred. You are nothing.” For his part, Vance wove personal anecdotes about Kirk’s faith into a broader political message, a move seen by many as a clear effort to position himself as the heir apparent to Trump by bridging the gap between the populist base and the Christian conservative movement.

The memorial was not just a tribute to a political leader; it was a powerful re-affirmation of a movement that is increasingly defining itself not by policy, but by a mission that its followers believe is both political and sacred. The fusion of the cross and the campaign, on full and unblinking display in a football stadium in Arizona, suggests that the MAGA movement is charting a new, and potentially more powerful, course for its future.

Dutch Police Clash with Anti-Immigration Protesters Ahead of Elections

Diane A. Wade
-
0
Dutch Police Clash with Anti-Immigration Protesters Ahead of Elections

THE HAGUE — Clashes have erupted between Dutch police and anti-immigration protesters in a violent confrontation that signals a deepening and dangerous divide in the Netherlands over the country’s immigration policies. The riot, which saw police use tear gas and water cannons, has plunged the nation into a state of political turmoil just weeks before a critical general election.

The violence unfolded in The Hague on Saturday, where thousands had gathered to demand a crackdown on asylum seekers. What began as a large but peaceful demonstration quickly spiraled out of control as a faction of protesters threw bottles and rocks at officers, set a police car on fire, and vandalized the headquarters of the center-left D66 party. In response, police deployed riot control units, a water cannon, and tear gas to regain order. At least two officers were injured and approximately 30 arrests were made, with authorities not ruling out more.

The unrest is a powerful symptom of a nation grappling with its identity. It comes just a month before a snap election on October 29, which was triggered by the collapse of the governing coalition after far-right leader Geert Wilders pulled his party from the administration over disagreements on migration policy. Wilders, whose party is leading in opinion polls, has made a promise to drastically reduce asylum for refugees a central pillar of his campaign.

The political reaction to the clashes was swift and sharp, highlighting the stark divisions in the country. Wilders himself, who was invited to the demonstration but did not attend, condemned the violence on social media, calling those involved “idiots” and “scum.” Caretaker Prime Minister Dick Schoof called the attacks on law enforcement “absolutely unacceptable,” while D66 leader Rob Jetten vowed, “We will never let extremist rioters take our beautiful country away.” Meanwhile, Frans Timmermans, the leader of the Labour-Green alliance, cast the scenes as “Trumpian conditions, fueled by politicians who sow fear and division,” urging citizens to make their voices heard.

For a nation long known for its stability and progressive policies, the violence serves as a stark warning. The riots are a powerful and visible manifestation of the raw political anger simmering beneath the surface, fueled by an election that has placed immigration at the very center of a battle for the country’s future.

A Nation Mourns Under Guard: Americans Gather in Arizona for Charlie Kirk Memorial

Nancy Clayson
-
0
A Nation Mourns Under Guard: Americans Gather in Arizona for Charlie Kirk Memorial

GLENDALE, AZ — Under the unblinking gaze of surveillance drones and a heavy law enforcement presence, thousands of Americans gathered on Sunday for the memorial service of conservative activist Charlie Kirk. The somber occasion, held at State Farm Stadium, was a powerful and poignant reminder of the political violence that led to his death and the deep divisions that now define the nation.

The event, designated a “Special Event Assessment Rating (SEAR) Level 1,” put security on par with the Super Bowl. Attendees faced airport-style security screenings, with a perimeter secured by federal agencies, including the Secret Service. The heightened measures were not a mere precaution; on Saturday, an armed man claiming to be a law enforcement officer was arrested at the stadium. The incident cast a long shadow over a memorial already steeped in sorrow and political tension.

Charlie Kirk assassination

The atmosphere inside the stadium was a complex mix of grief and defiance. For many in the crowd, Kirk was a unifying figure, a fiery yet inspiring voice for a generation of young conservatives. The memorial was as much a political rally as it was a funeral, with a who’s who of the Republican Party’s inner circle in attendance. President Donald Trump, Vice President J.D. Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard were among the top officials who paid tribute to Kirk’s legacy. Kirk’s widow, Erika Kirk, who was recently named the new CEO of Turning Point USA, also spoke, vowing to continue her late husband’s work.

The service, however, was not without its critics. Outside the stadium, a small group of protesters gathered, arguing that the event was a political spectacle and that Kirk’s legacy was one of division. While the nation mourns the loss of a life, the memorial service itself has become a symbol of a country struggling to reconcile its profound political differences.

A Diplomatic Earthquake: Keir Starmer’s Historic Shift to Recognize Palestinian State

James J. Williams
-
0
A Diplomatic Earthquake: Keir Starmer’s Historic Shift to Recognize Palestinian State

LONDON — In a historic and politically seismic move, Prime Minister Keir Starmer is set to announce on September 21 that the United Kingdom will officially recognize a Palestinian state, a long-sought goal of the Palestinian people and a profound shift in British foreign policy. The decision comes after what Downing Street has described as Israel’s failure to meet a series of conditions set out by Starmer in July to improve the deteriorating humanitarian situation in Gaza.

The announcement is expected to be a key element of the UK’s diplomatic push at the upcoming United Nations General Assembly in New York. While recognition of a Palestinian state has been a long-standing commitment of the Labour Party, the timing and context of the move are highly charged. Starmer previously said the UK’s recognition was contingent upon Israel agreeing to a ceasefire, committing to a two-state solution, and halting illegal settlement expansion in the West Bank. Officials have concluded that, with the humanitarian crisis worsening and a new Israeli ground offensive in Gaza City, those conditions have not been met, forcing the UK’s hand.

Photo AP

The decision is expected to be met with a furious backlash from Israel, with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu having already condemned the move as “appeasement towards jihadist terrorists” and a reward for Hamas. The United States has also expressed its opposition, with leading U.S. politicians urging the UK and its allies to reverse course, arguing that such a move undermines prospects for peace and “rewards Hamas with statehood before they have returned every hostage.”

For the Palestinian Authority, the recognition will be a major diplomatic victory, bringing the Palestinian people one step closer to full self-determination. Over 147 of the 193 UN member states already recognize a Palestinian state, and the UK’s move, following France’s decision earlier this year, could trigger a domino effect as other key allies like Canada and Australia consider similar actions. The move will also allow for the establishment of a Palestinian embassy in London and for the UK to treat Palestine as a sovereign entity in its diplomatic relations.

While some domestic critics question the timing and the potential for a diplomatic rift with the U.S. and Israel, Starmer and his government appear to believe that a bold and decisive action is necessary to revive the long-stalled peace process. The recognition of a Palestinian state, a move that only a few years ago was considered a distant prospect, is now a reality—a powerful signal that the international community’s patience for a peaceful two-state solution is wearing thin.

H-1B Visa: India Warns New US Visa Fee Will Have ‘Humanitarian Consequences’

Diane A. Wade
-
0
H-1B Visa: India Warns New US Visa Fee Will Have ‘Humanitarian Consequences’

India has launched a scathing diplomatic protest against the new U.S. fee for skilled worker visas, warning that the policy will have “serious humanitarian consequences” and could disrupt the lives of tens of thousands of skilled Indian workers and their families. The move, which introduces a unprecedented $100,000 fee for H-1B visa applications, has turned a routine immigration issue into a major diplomatic flashpoint.

The Indian Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) issued a strongly worded statement on Saturday, expressing “serious concern” and directly challenging the Trump administration’s rationale for the fee. While the U.S. framed the measure as a way to curb “abuse” of the H-1B program and protect American jobs, the MEA’s spokesperson stated that the “disruption caused for families” is a significant concern that policymakers must address. The warning came as major Indian and U.S. tech companies scrambled to advise employees on H-1B visas who were abroad to return to the U.S. before the fee took effect, a one-day deadline that has created widespread panic.

The new policy represents a staggering increase from the previous application fees, which typically ranged from $2,000 to $5,000. It is a direct blow to India, which accounts for over 70 percent of all H-1B visa recipients, many of whom are working for the world’s largest tech companies. The National Association of Software and Service Companies (NASSCOM), India’s leading tech industry body, echoed the government’s concerns, warning of “ripple effects” that could harm the U.S. innovation ecosystem and the global job market.

The diplomatic spat also takes place against the backdrop of ongoing trade tensions between the two countries. An Indian delegation, led by Commerce and Industries Minister Piyush Goyal, is scheduled to visit Washington, D.C., for talks, and some Indian officials privately view the new visa fee as a form of “pressure tactic” by the U.S. to gain leverage in those negotiations.

The Trump administration has defended the policy as a way to ensure that only the “very best” and most exceptional foreign talent enters the country, arguing that the H-1B visa has been used to undercut American wages. But critics on both sides of the Pacific argue that the move is an economic and humanitarian self-inflicted wound.

The conflict over the H-1B visa is no longer confined to the boardrooms of Silicon Valley or the halls of Congress. It has become a personal and deeply human issue for thousands of Indian families whose lives are now in a state of uncertainty, a stark reminder of the global consequences of an “America First” immigration policy.

Russia’s Aerial Barrage Kills Three as Ukraine’s Cities Endure Night of Terror

Roy Siemens
-
0
Russia’s Aerial Barrage Kills Three as Ukraine’s Cities Endure Night of Terror

KYIV — In one of the most intense bombardments in recent weeks, Russia unleashed a “massive” aerial attack on Ukraine on Saturday, killing at least three people and wounding dozens more as a barrage of missiles and drones struck cities across the country. The onslaught, which included a missile equipped with cluster munitions hitting a residential building, prompted a renewed call from Ukrainian officials for more air defense systems from Western allies.

According to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, the attacks took place across nine regions, with major strikes reported in Dnipro, Kharkiv, and Kyiv. A missile carrying cluster munitions directly struck a high-rise apartment building in the city of Dnipro, killing at least one person and injuring 26, according to the regional governor. Other casualties included a 62-year-old man killed in a drone attack in northern Ukraine’s Chernihiv region and another person killed in the Khmelnytskyi region, where firefighting crews recovered a body from a damaged residential building.

The Ukrainian Air Force said it had detected a total of 619 drones and missiles in the overnight attack, a mix that included cruise and ballistic missiles, along with hundreds of drones. While Ukrainian air defenses claimed to have shot down or neutralized the vast majority of the projectiles, the sheer scale of the assault overwhelmed some defenses, allowing strikes to hit civilian areas and critical infrastructure.

In a social media statement, President Zelensky condemned the strikes, calling them “not a military necessity but a deliberate strategy by Russia to terrorize civilians and destroy our infrastructure.” He urged international partners to provide more air defense systems and impose additional sanctions on Russia, arguing that “every restriction on Russia saves lives.” The attacks come as both sides have stepped up their use of long-range aerial assaults, with Ukraine claiming its drones hit several Russian oil refineries and pumping stations on Saturday.

The continued violence highlights a grim reality in a war where the front lines have become increasingly static, forcing both sides to escalate their campaigns to strike at each other’s home fronts and critical infrastructure. While diplomatic efforts to broker a ceasefire have stalled, the human toll continues to mount with each successive barrage.

The $100,000 Surcharge: Trump’s Visa Fee Reshapes U.S. Immigration

Clyde K. Valle
-
0
The $100,000 Surcharge: Trump’s Visa Fee Reshapes U.S. Immigration

In a dramatic and sweeping overhaul of the nation’s immigration system, the Trump administration has introduced a new and unprecedented $100,000 fee for companies seeking to sponsor skilled worker visas. The move, announced via a proclamation on Friday, targets the H-1B visa program, a system long relied upon by the tech sector, and is being framed as an aggressive effort to protect American jobs and curb what the administration calls systemic abuse.

The new fee, which took effect immediately, requires employers to pay the $100,000 for each new H-1B applicant coming from abroad. The administration has clarified that the fee is a one-time payment, though initial reports had suggested it would be an annual charge. Still, the immense financial barrier represents a staggering increase from the current fees, which typically range from a few thousand to around $5,000. While the proclamation does not apply to current H-1B visa holders already in the U.S., it has prompted companies like Microsoft to issue an urgent advisory urging employees to avoid international travel and return to the country before the new rule took effect.

The administration’s rationale for the change is rooted in its “America First” agenda. According to White House staff secretary Will Scharf, the H-1B program, originally designed to attract exceptional foreign talent, has been exploited to replace American workers with “lower-paid, lower-skilled” labor. The administration argues that the new fee will force companies to hire only the most exceptional candidates who are truly indispensable, thereby creating more opportunities for American graduates. President Trump stated that this is not only an economic issue but also a matter of national security, citing investigations into visa fraud and other illicit activities.

The reaction from the tech community has been one of shock and alarm. Critics warn that the steep fee will have a chilling effect on innovation and could lead to a significant “brain drain” as highly skilled foreign workers look to other countries. While large tech giants like Amazon and Microsoft may be able to absorb the new costs for a select few key employees, smaller startups and companies with a high reliance on foreign talent could be hit hardest. Critics also argue that this move could hamper the U.S.’s position in the global race for innovation, particularly in fast-moving fields like artificial intelligence.

For a system that has long been a key part of the U.S. economy, the new fee represents a momentous shift, and is a clear signal that the administration is prioritizing protectionism over global talent.

The Late-Night Stand: Hosts Rally Around Kimmel as Trump Targets TV Networks

Sonia Pantiss
-
0
The Late-Night Stand: Hosts Rally Around Kimmel as Trump Targets TV Networks

In an unprecedented show of solidarity, the titans of late-night television have rallied around their colleague Jimmy Kimmel, as President Trump escalates his rhetoric and directly threatens to strip broadcast licenses from networks that dare to criticize him. The rare, unified response from hosts across the dial marks a dramatic escalation of the ongoing battle between the administration and the American media, turning a broadcast controversy into a high-stakes showdown over the future of the First Amendment.

The chorus of support for Kimmel followed the stunning news that ABC had indefinitely suspended his show in the wake of comments he made about the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk. The suspension was preceded by a public condemnation from FCC Chairman Brendan Carr, a Trump appointee, who called Kimmel’s remarks “sick” and hinted at regulatory action. On Thursday, President Trump himself weighed in, celebrating the suspension on social media and telling reporters that networks giving him “only bad press” might have their “licenses…taken away.”

The thinly veiled threats and the silencing of one of their own prompted a series of uncharacteristically serious and often satirical monologues from Kimmel’s peers.

  • Stephen Colbert, whose own show was canceled by CBS earlier this year in a move many believed was politically motivated, used his platform to deliver a somber warning. “We are all Jimmy Kimmel,” he told his audience, later adding, “With an autocrat, you cannot give an inch… if ABC thinks this is going to satisfy the regime, they are woefully naive.”
  • Jon Stewart, making a surprise appearance on The Daily Show, delivered a biting satire on the new rules of free speech, joking that in America, we now have a “talent-o-meter” that measures a performer’s loyalty to the president. “It’s managed media. And it’s no good,” Stewart later said at a public event. “It’s silly. It’s ridiculous. You can’t go around firing somebody because you’re fearful or trying to suck up to an authoritarian criminal administration.”
  • Seth Meyers opened his show by sarcastically praising the president, claiming any past negative comments must have been “just AI,” before delivering a heartfelt defense of Kimmel and free expression. “It is a privilege and an honor to call Jimmy Kimmel my friend, in the same way that it’s a privilege and honor to do this show every night,” he said.
  • Jimmy Fallon also used his monologue to express solidarity, telling his audience, “To be honest with you all, I don’t know what’s going on. And no one does. But I do know Jimmy Kimmel, and he’s a decent, funny and loving guy, and I hope he comes back.”

The unified response from Kimmel’s colleagues signals a new and more confrontational era for late-night television. For years, the shows have offered a mix of comedy and political commentary, often at the risk of alienating half the country. But with the suspension of a peer and the explicit threats from the highest office, the stakes are now existential. The conflict is no longer just a media feud but a full-blown constitutional and political showdown, with the freedom of the press and the soul of a democratic institution hanging in the balance.

US Vetoes UN Gaza Ceasefire Call for Sixth Time

Roy Siemens
-
0
US Vetoes UN Gaza Ceasefire Call for Sixth Time

For the sixth time since the war began, the United States has vetoed a United Nations Security Council resolution calling for an immediate and permanent ceasefire in Gaza, cementing its diplomatic isolation on the world stage even as the humanitarian crisis inside the enclave deepens. The vote, which saw 14 of the 15 council members unite in favor of the measure, underscored the growing chasm between Washington and the rest of the world on the Israel-Hamas conflict.

The draft resolution, put forward by the council’s ten elected members, demanded an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire, the release of all hostages held by Hamas, and the lifting of all restrictions on the delivery of humanitarian aid. But the U.S. representative, Morgan Ortagus, stated that the U.S. would not support a measure that “fails to condemn Hamas” or “recognize Israel’s right to defend itself.” Ortagus accused the council of engaging in “performative action” and said the resolution’s demands were “unacceptable” as they would leave Hamas in a position to carry out future attacks.

The veto drew immediate and sharp condemnation. The Palestinian ambassador to the UN, Riyad Mansour, expressed “anger and frustration” at the council’s failure to act. In a raw and emotional address, Algeria’s ambassador, Amar Bendjama, apologized to the Palestinian people, saying the council “could not save your children.” He accused the U.S. of being complicit in a “genocide unfolding before open eyes,” a sentiment echoed by diplomats from Russia and China, who said Washington was “abusing” its veto power.

The diplomatic standoff unfolded against a backdrop of a worsening human catastrophe on the ground. The vote took place as Israeli tanks and jets pounded Gaza City, the target of a major new ground offensive. The UN’s humanitarian office has warned that the last lifelines for civilians are collapsing in the besieged city, which a recent food crisis report says is now experiencing widespread famine. According to health authorities in Gaza, the death toll from the conflict has surpassed 65,000.

The U.S. position remains steadfast. U.S. officials maintain that a ceasefire must be linked to the release of all hostages, arguing that a temporary halt to the fighting would only allow Hamas to regroup and rearm. The U.S. has continued to work through back channels to secure a ceasefire deal and the release of hostages, but with each successive veto, Washington finds itself increasingly isolated on a humanitarian issue that has captivated the world.

For the international community, the US’s continued use of its veto power sends a clear message that the diplomatic process is at a standstill. While the diplomatic battle rages on, the human toll on the ground grows with each passing day—a tragic testament to the high cost of the ongoing stalemate.

Brendan Carr’s FCC Takes on President Trump’s Media Foes

Lisa.Felice
-
0
Brendan Carr’s FCC Takes on President Trump’s Media Foes

Under the leadership of its new chairman, Brendan Carr, a longtime Trump loyalist, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has taken on a more aggressive and openly political role, wielding its regulatory power to challenge media outlets and hosts critical of the administration. This new posture, most visibly demonstrated in the recent suspension of the late-night talk show Jimmy Kimmel Live!, is raising serious questions about the future of media regulation and free speech.

Carr, who was elevated to the chairmanship by President Trump in January, has wasted no time in making his intentions clear. In the wake of a monologue by Kimmel that criticized the administration’s response to a political assassination, Carr appeared on a conservative podcast and suggested the FCC could take “the hard way” with broadcasters who aired what he called “sick” and “misleading” content. Just hours after Carr’s warning, major ABC affiliates began to drop the show, and ABC announced its indefinite suspension. Critics, including House Democrats, are calling Carr’s actions a “corrupt abuse of power” and have demanded his resignation.

The FCC’s new approach marks a significant shift from its traditional role. While the agency has the authority to issue licenses and regulate broadcast content under a broad “public interest” standard, it has historically avoided intervening in political speech, and the FCC’s own website states that it is expressly prohibited from censoring broadcast matter. However, Carr has embraced a more expansive view of the FCC’s mission, arguing that the agency has a responsibility to combat “news distortion” and hold broadcasters accountable for what he deems to be inaccurate or politically motivated content.

This new legal and political playbook is already proving effective. The suspension of the Kimmel show follows a similar incident involving CBS and its parent company, Paramount. After the company’s merger with Skydance was in jeopardy and was only approved after a settlement with President Trump, it canceled The Late Show with Stephen Colbert. The timing of both events has led critics to argue that the FCC, under Carr, is using its regulatory authority to coerce media companies and chill free speech.

The FCC’s aggressive stance is being cheered by President Trump, who has long accused mainstream media outlets of being “the enemy of the people.” For his critics, however, the FCC’s actions represent a dangerous escalation, raising fears that the government is blurring the line between a media regulator and a political enforcer, with dangerous consequences for the First Amendment.

1...101112...1,237Page 11 of 1,237