LONDON – A groundbreaking civil case against controversial social media personality Andrew Tate is unfolding in the United Kingdom’s High Court, with legal experts suggesting it could mark a significant first in how allegations of “coercive control” are addressed within civil law. Four women are suing Tate, alleging sexual violence, rape, and assault, with their legal team arguing that his behavior amounted to the intentional infliction of harm through coercive and controlling actions.
During a preliminary hearing on Tuesday, Anne Studd KC, representing the women, told the court that this case is “understood to be the first claim where allegations of coercive control have been considered in a civil context of whether that behaviour can amount to intentional infliction of harm.” She described coercive control as “a form of grooming and manipulation where the victim becomes less and less able to respond in what might be perceived as a normal way.”
The allegations against Tate, dating back to 2012-2015, include claims of strangulation, assault with a belt, and even pointing a gun at one of the women. The claimants are reportedly seeking damages likely to reach a six-figure sum.
Matthew Jury, a lawyer representing the four women, emphasized the importance of expert evidence on coercive control being presented to the court, stating outside the hearing that it was “significant and important in this case” to ensure a “proper and fair hearing.” He highlighted that this civil action is currently “the only live proceeding in which Andrew Tate will be facing justice,” given the complexities and delays in the ongoing criminal investigations in Romania.
Image source: Wikimedia Commons
Tate’s legal representative, Vanessa Marshall KC, argued against the necessity of additional expert evidence on coercive control, stating that the presiding judge would be “entirely competent to deal with the issues.” However, Judge Richard Armstrong ultimately allowed the women to rely on evidence from one expert on the matter.
This civil case comes after the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) in the UK decided not to pursue criminal charges against Tate in 2019, a decision that has fueled the claimants’ pursuit of justice through civil avenues.
The outcome of this case could have significant legal ramifications, potentially establishing a precedent for how civil courts in the UK address claims of harm resulting from coercive and controlling behavior within relationships and other contexts. The trial, which could last up to three weeks, is tentatively scheduled for early 2027.
Tate, through his legal representatives, has consistently denied all allegations, both criminal and civil, describing the claims as “false” and a “pack of lies.” He has stated his intention to defend himself “vigorously” and remains confident that the truth will prevail.
The proceedings are being closely watched by legal experts and victim advocacy groups, who hope that this case will provide a crucial avenue for accountability in situations where criminal prosecution has not proceeded, and for recognizing the profound harm caused by coercive and controlling behaviors.
