The hallowed grounds of Centre Court, usually a bastion of precision and tradition, were today momentarily plunged into a technological farce, as Wimbledon organizers issued a rare apology after its much-vaunted electronic line-calling system was inexplicably turned off during a pivotal match. The embarrassing blunder resulted in three missed calls in a single game, sparking confusion on court and frustration among fans.
The incident occurred during a hotly contested third-round match between two of the tournament’s rising stars. In a crucial game during the second set, the automated “Hawk-Eye Live” system, which is typically responsible for instantaneously and audibly calling lines in real-time, suddenly went silent. The human line judges, who still sit on court but primarily serve as backups to the electronic system, were forced to intervene, leading to a series of contentious calls that would have ordinarily been decided by technology.
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova said a game was ‘stolen’ from her after there was no ‘out’ call when a Sonay Kartal backhand went long in the first set of their fourth-round match.
The Russian stopped after seeing the ball go long, and chair umpire Nico Helwerth halted play.
“It was just bizarre,” remarked tennis pundit and former professional player Martina Navratilova, observing the unfolding drama. “You’re so used to the instantaneous ‘out’ call, and suddenly, it’s just silence. The players were looking around, confused. It really disrupted the flow of the game.”

The All England Lawn Tennis Club (AELTC) swiftly acknowledged the error following the match. In a statement, Wimbledon organizers confirmed that the electronic line-calling system on Centre Court had been “inadvertently deactivated” due to a technical oversight. They expressed sincere apologies to the players, officials, and fans for the disruption.
“We deeply regret the momentary lapse in our electronic line-calling service on Centre Court today,” read the official statement. “Due to an unforeseen technical error, the system was turned off during a portion of the match. We have rectified the issue and extend our apologies to all affected, particularly the players involved.”
While the AELTC did not specify which players were impacted or the exact scoreline during the affected game, the missed calls were immediately noticeable to players and fans alike. One particular point, where a ball appeared clearly out but was called in by a human line judge, sparked an audible groan from the crowd and visibly frustrated one of the competitors.
The incident is a rare blot on Wimbledon’s otherwise impeccable record of technological integration. Hawk-Eye, and its more advanced “Live” iteration, has largely been hailed as a triumph for fairness and accuracy in tennis, largely eliminating contentious line calls that once dominated matches. This glitch, however, serves as a stark reminder that even the most sophisticated AI systems are still reliant on human management and can be susceptible to human error.
The system was quickly brought back online for the remainder of the match and has reportedly been fully operational since. But for a few chaotic minutes on Centre Court, the future of tennis officiating took a surprising detour back to its human past, leaving organizers red-faced and fans with a memorable, albeit regrettable, anecdote from this year’s championships.