Harvey Weinstein has been sentenced to 23 years
in prison for rape and assault.
The disgraced Hollywood producer was found guilty in a trial in New York
last month.
Hervey Weinstein, 67, appeared in court on March 11 in a wheelchair.
The producer’s lawyers had appealed for leniency, saying even the minimum
sentence of five years could be a “life sentence”.
However, prosecutors argued Harvey Weinstein should be given the maximum
possible sentence given his “lifetime of abuse” towards women and
“lack of remorse” for his actions.
Harvey Weinstein addressed the court for the first time on March 11, saying
he had “deep remorse” but described him and other men as
“totally confused” by events in comments seen as critical to the
#MeToo movement.
Dozens of women have come forward
with allegations of misconduct, including rape, against Harvey Weinstein since
October 2017.
He has consistently denied
wrongdoing and these were the first charges to make it to trial.
Harvey Weinstein still faces further
criminal charges, for rape and assault, in Los Angeles.
His lawyers have vowed to appeal
against his conviction.
Harvey Weinstein was found guilty of
committing a first-degree criminal sexual act against production assistant
Miriam Haley in 2006 and of the third-degree rape of aspiring actress Jessica
Mann in 2013.
New York jurors acquitted Weinstein
of the most serious charges, of predatory sexual assault, which could have seen
him given an even longer jail term.
All six women who testified against
him during his trial sat together as he was sentenced and told to register as a
sex offender.
The two women he was convicted of assaulting both read out victim impact
statements in court.
Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. thanked the court for the tough
sentence, saying it put “predators and abusive partners” elsewhere in
society “on notice”.
Speaking outside court, Gloria Allred, who represents three of the accusers,
held up a sign with the words: “This
is what justice looks like.”
“For all those who are still
preying on women, who want to engage in the high risk-taking of harming women
and thinking you’ll get away with it, that gamble is likely not to pay off for
you anymore,” she added.
“And if you’re a high-profile
figure, don’t expect anything but equal justice.”
The US Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network (RAINN) praised the significant prison term Harvey Weinstein was given.
Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein was
convicted in New York City of third-degree rape and first-degree criminal sexual
act.
The 67-year-old was cleared of the most serious count of predatory sexual
assault. He faces up to 25 years in prison.
Harvey Weinstein still faces charges in Los Angeles of assaulting two women
in 2013.
At least 80 women had accused him of misconduct stretching back decades,
including actresses Gwyneth Paltrow, Uma Thurman and Salma Hayek.
The allegations were at the center of the #MeToo movement that inspired
women to go public with misconduct allegations against powerful men.
Haevey Weinstein once enjoyed phenomenal success with Oscar winners such Pulp Fiction, Good Will Hunting, The King’s
Speech and Shakespeare in Love.
The jury of seven men and five women reached their verdict on February 24,
the fifth day of deliberations.
Harvey Weinstein – who denied all charges – was convicted of assaulting
former production assistant Mimi Haleyi in 2006 and raping Jessica Mann, a
former aspiring actress, in 2013. The judge ordered him sent to jail
immediately.
However, the jury acquitted him on
two counts of predatory sexual assault, which carried a potential life
sentence, and first-degree rape of Jessica Mann.
In the minutes after the verdict, Harvey
Weinstein showed no emotion as he talked to his lead lawyer Donna Rotunno. He
will be sentenced on March 11.
The third-degree rape charge in New
York is defined as engaging in intercourse with a person who is incapable of
consent, or under age 17, or who has not given consent for a reason other than
the inability to consent.
Prosecutors portrayed Harvey Weinstein
as a serial predator who used his position of power in Hollywood to manipulate
and attack women.
The defense team said intercourse between
Harvey Weinstein and the accusers was consensual, and that the accusers used
the relations to advance their careers. The allegations amounted to “regret
renamed as rape”, the defense said. Two of the accusers kept in contact
with Harvey Weinstein and had intimate relations with him after the alleged
attacks, they pointed out.
Mimi Haleyi, who had worked on one of Harvey Weinstein’s TV productions,
said she was assaulted by the producer after he invited her to his Lower
Manhattan home.
Jessica Mann said that she found
herself in an “extremely degrading” relationship with him that did
not involve intercourse until he raped her in a New York City hotel room in
2013.
She said he was a “Jekyll and
Hyde” figure who could be charming in public but showed his dark side when
they were alone.
Another one of Harvey Weinstein’s
accusers, actress Annabella Sciorra, told jurors he raped her in her apartment
one night in the mid-1990s.
Her allegation was too old to be
charged as a separate crime, but prosecutors used it in an attempt to
demonstrate that the accused was a repeat offender.
Following the verdict, Annabella
Sciorra said: “I spoke for myself
and with the strength of the 80-plus victims of Harvey Weinstein in my
heart.”
Three other also women testified they were lured to apparent work meetings
with Harvey Weinstein, then assaulted.
Donna Rotunno told reporters outside the courthouse: “The fight is not over…Harvey is unbelievably strong. He took it
like a man and he knows we will continue to fight for him and he knows that
this is not over.”
The lawyer said her client was disappointed, but “mentally tough”.
The judge in the Harvey Weinstein trial has
warned the lead defense lawyer, Donna Rotunno, not to talk to the press, after
she penned an opinion piece on February 15.
Writing in Newsweek, Donna Rotunno
called on jurors to “do what they know is right”.
However, Donna Rotunno told Justice James Burke the piece was not intended
to address the jury directly.
The row came before the jury of seven men and five women were sent away to
try to reach a verdict.
The jury has now finished the deliberations for the day, after asking for
clarification of legal terms and for plans of the apartment where one of the
alleged assaults took place.
Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein has pleaded not guilty to assaulting
former production assistant Mimi (Miriam) Haleyi and raping former actress
Jessica Mann.
The trial began in New York in January.
Accusations of misconduct against
Harvey Weinstein by dozens of women helped drive the #MeToo movement.
Only two of the accusers’ cases,
those of Mimi Haleyi and Jessica Mann, have led to individual criminal charges
in New York, but the testimony of others is being used as supporting evidence.
Judge James Burke instructed jurors
on February 18 before they retired to consider their verdict.
As the court session opened, prosecutors asked the judge to instruct jurors
to ignore the Newsweek piece as it
was “100% inappropriate”.
The judge refused the prosecutors’ request, but restated a ban he imposed at
the beginning of the trial on both defense and prosecution from giving media
interviews.
He told Donna Rotunno: “I would
caution you about the tentacles of your public relations juggernaut.”
She responded: “This is an op-ed
about the jury system as a whole, about the criminal justice system as a
whole.”
In the Newsweek piece, Donna
Rotunno accused her opponents of trying to influence the trial.
She wrote: “The mocking of Mr.
Weinstein’s walker, the unflattering courtroom-artist sketches of his body, the
countless critical op-eds and biased stories, and the convenient timing of the
politically-motivated charges in Los Angeles were all designed to pre-determine
his guilt.”
Adding: “I implore the members of
this jury to do what they know is right and was expected of them from the
moment they were called upon to serve their civic duty in a court of law.”
However, Judge Burke asked the defense:
“You don’t think addressing the jury in the first person isn’t
problematic?”
Prosecutors have argued Harvey Weinstein was a “seasoned” predator
who preyed on aspiring young actresses.
The 67-year-old’s defense team said his actions were consensual, including
in one “loving” relationship. They also said prosecutors had failed
to present any forensic evidence or eyewitness accounts.
Harvey Weinstein denies five charges, including rape and assault, relating
to two accusers. The jury must reach unanimous verdicts on each count.
The Hollywood mogul, who never took the stand during the trial, could face
life behind bars if convicted.
Once one of Hollywood’s most decorated and lauded producers, Harvey Weinstein
has been accused of misconduct by more than 80 women.
However, few of the
The judge in the Harvey Weinstein trial has
warned the lead defense lawyer, Donna Rotunno, not to talk to the press, after
she penned an opinion piece on February 15.
Writing in Newsweek, Donna Rotunno
called on jurors to “do what they know is right”.
However, Donna Rotunno told Justice James Burke the piece was not intended
to address the jury directly.
The row came before the jury of seven men and five women were sent away to
try to reach a verdict.
The jury has now finished the deliberations for the day, after asking for
clarification of legal terms and for plans of the apartment where one of the
alleged assaults took place.
Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein has pleaded not guilty to assaulting
former production assistant Mimi (Miriam) Haleyi and raping former actress
Jessica Mann.
The trial began in New York in January.
Accusations of misconduct against
Harvey Weinstein by dozens of women helped drive the #MeToo movement.
Only two of the accusers’ cases,
those of Mimi Haleyi and Jessica Mann, have led to individual criminal charges
in New York, but the testimony of others is being used as supporting evidence.
Judge James Burke instructed jurors
on February 18 before they retired to consider their verdict.
As the court session opened, prosecutors asked the judge to instruct jurors
to ignore the Newsweek piece as it
was “100% inappropriate”.
The judge refused the prosecutors’ request, but restated a ban he imposed at
the beginning of the trial on both defense and prosecution from giving media
interviews.
He told Donna Rotunno: “I would
caution you about the tentacles of your public relations juggernaut.”
She responded: “This is an op-ed
about the jury system as a whole, about the criminal justice system as a
whole.”
In the Newsweek piece, Donna
Rotunno accused her opponents of trying to influence the trial.
She wrote: “The mocking of Mr.
Weinstein’s walker, the unflattering courtroom-artist sketches of his body, the
countless critical op-eds and biased stories, and the convenient timing of the
politically-motivated charges in Los Angeles were all designed to pre-determine
his guilt.”
Adding: “I implore the members of
this jury to do what they know is right and was expected of them from the
moment they were called upon to serve their civic duty in a court of law.”
However, Judge Burke asked the defense:
“You don’t think addressing the jury in the first person isn’t
problematic?”
Prosecutors have argued Harvey Weinstein was a “seasoned” predator
who preyed on aspiring young actresses.
The 67-year-old’s defense team said his actions were consensual, including
in one “loving” relationship. They also said prosecutors had failed
to present any forensic evidence or eyewitness accounts.
Harvey Weinstein denies five charges, including rape and assault, relating
to two accusers. The jury must reach unanimous verdicts on each count.
The Hollywood mogul, who never took the stand during the trial, could face
life behind bars if convicted.
Once one of Hollywood’s most decorated and lauded producers, Harvey Weinstein
has been accused of misconduct by more than 80 women.
However, few of the complaints have led to criminal charges.
Former Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein has been threatened with jail for using his phone in a New York City court where a jury is being picked for his rape trial.
Judge James Burke asked him: “Is
this really the way you want to end up in jail for the rest of your life, by
texting and violating a court order?”
The judge instructed Harvey Weinstein, who is out on bail, not to answer the
question.
He faces five charges and possibly life in jail if convicted.
The allegations include rape and assault relating to two
unnamed accusers. He is charged with raping one woman in a Manhattan hotel room
in 2013, and performing a forcible sex act on the second woman in 2006.
On January 6, Harvey Weinstein was charged with an additional two counts in
Los Angeles: rape and assault.
He has denied all charges and insists any encounters were consensual.
According to local media, on January 7, Harvey Weinstein, 67, was caught using
two mobile phones in court. He had already been admonished by Judge Burke at
previous court appearances for using a handset.
Judge Burke said: “What did I say
would happen if he so much has a cellphone or electronic device since there
have been repeated violations of this, including some on the record?”
“I believe you said remand,”
Harvey Weinstein’s lawyer replied after a heated exchange, meaning to put his
client in jail.
Lead prosecutor Joan Illuzzi urged
Judge Burke to jail Harvey Weinstein, who is out on $5 million bail. He is
required to wear an electronic tracking device.
“There is a grave risk that this defendant at some
point will realize that the evidence against him is imposing and overwhelming” and he will try to escape, Joan Illuzzi said.
Judge Burke ultimately declined to
revoke Harvey Weinstein’s bail, but told the former movie mogul he would not
get any further warning.
“I’m not looking for apologies,” Judge Burke said.
“I’m looking for compliance.”
In court, Harvey Weinstein’s lawyer,
Arthur Aidala, asked Judge Burke to delay jury selection, arguing that the jury
pool had been tarnished by the extensive press coverage of the Los Angeles
charges filed on January 6.
Judge Burke rejected the defense
request.
After jury selection, Harvey Weinstein’s New York trial is expected to begin in around two weeks.
Harvey Weinstein attended the court
hearing in New York using a walking frame. His lawyers said he was undergoing
surgery on December 12 for injuries suffered in a car accident in August.
The $25 million settlement is part
of a larger $47 million package intended to close the Weinstein Company’s
liabilities, including legal fees. Harvey Weinstein would not pay personally,
the sum would come from insurance companies representing the Weinstein Company.
A group lawsuit had been brought by
dozens of women who accuse Harvey Weinstein of harassment and abuse, though
high-profile figures who have also made allegations, such as Gwyneth Paltrow
and Angelina Jolie, are not part of the action.
Genie Harrison, a lawyer for one of
the plaintiffs, told the New York Times:
“I don’t think there’s a markedly
better deal to be made.”
She said other alleged victims who
hold out could end up with nothing, and that they should “come forward and
be able to get the best level of compensation we were able to get”.
One plaintiff backing the deal, Louisette Geiss, told Associated Press: “This settlement will ensure that all survivors have the chance for recovery and can move forward without Harvey’s damaging lock on their careers.”
This website has updated its privacy policy in compliance with EU GDPR 2016/679. Please read this to review the updates about which personal data we collect on our site. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our updated policy. AcceptRejectRead More
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.